Showing posts with label Consequences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consequences. Show all posts

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Tidal power plant







The invention:



Plant that converts the natural ocean tidal forces

into electrical power.



The people behind the invention:



Mariano di Jacopo detto Taccola (Mariano of Siena, 1381-1453),

an Italian notary, artist, and engineer

Bernard Forest de Bélidor (1697 or 1698-1761), a French engineer

Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945), president of the United States







Tidal Energy



Ocean tides have long been harnessed to perform useful work.

Ancient Greeks, Romans, and medieval Europeans all left records

and ruins of tidal mills, and Mariano di Jacopo included tidal power

in his treatise De Ingeneis (1433; on engines). Some mills consisted of

water wheels suspended in tidal currents, others lifted weights that

powered machinery as they fell, and still others trapped the high

tide to run a mill.

Bernard Forest de Bélidor’s Architecture hydraulique (1737; hydraulic

architecture) is often cited as initiating the modern era of

tidal power exploitation. Bélidor was an instructor in the French

École d’Artillerie et du Génie (School of Artillery and Engineering).

Industrial expansion between 1700 and 1800 led to the construction

of many tidal mills. In these mills, waterwheels or simple turbines

rotated shafts that drove machinery by means of gears or

belts. They powered small enterprises located on the seashore.

Steam engines, however, soon began to replace tidal mills. Steam

could be generated wherever it was needed, and steam mills were

not dependent upon the tides or limited in their production capacity

by the amount of tidal flow. Thus, tidal mills gradually were abandoned,

although a few still operate in New England, Great Britain,

France, and elsewhere.



Electric Power from Tides



Modern society requires tremendous amounts of electric energy

generated by large power stations. This need was first met by

using coal and by damming rivers. Later, oil and nuclear power became

important. Although small mechanical tidal mills are inadequate

for modern needs, tidal power itself remains an attractive

source of energy. Periodic alarms about coal or oil supplies and

concern about the negative effects on the environment of using

coal, oil, or nuclear energy continue to stimulate efforts to develop

renewable energy sources with fewer negative effects. Every crisis—

for example, the perceived European coal shortages in the

early 1900’s, oil shortages in the 1920’s and 1970’s, and growing

anxiety about nuclear power—revives interest in tidal power.

In 1912, a tidal power plant was proposed at Busum, Germany.

The English, in 1918 and more recently, promoted elaborate schemes

for the Severn Estuary. In 1928, the French planned a plant at Aber-

Wrach in Brittany. In 1935, under the leadership of Franklin Delano

Roosevelt, the United States began construction of a tidal power

plant at Passamaquoddy, Maine. These plants, however, were never

built. All of them had to be located at sites where tides were extremely

high, and such sites are often far from power users. So

much electricity was lost in transmission that profitable quantities

of power could not be sent where they were needed. Also, large

tidal power stations were too expensive to compete with existing

steam plants and river dams. In addition, turbines and generators

capable of using the large volumes of slow-moving tidal water that

reversed flow had not been invented. Finally, large tidal plants inevitably

hampered navigation, fisheries, recreation, and other uses

of the sea and shore.

French engineers, especially Robert Gibrat, the father of the La

Rance project, have made the most progress in solving the problems

of tidal power plants. France, a highly industrialized country, is

short of coal and petroleum, which has brought about an intense

search by the French for alternative energy supplies.

La Rance, which was completed in December, 1967, is the first

full-scale tidal electric power plant in the world. The Chinese, however,

have built more than a hundred small tidal electric stations about the size of the old mechanical tidal mills, and the Canadians

and the Russians have both operated plants of pilot-plant size.

La Rance, which was selected from more than twenty competing

localities in France, is one of a few places in the world where the

tides are extremely high. It also has a large reservoir that is located

above a narrow constriction in the estuary. Finally, interference with

navigation, fisheries, and recreational activities is minimal at La

Rance.

Submersible “bulbs” containing generators and mounting propeller

turbines were specially designed for the La Rance project.

These turbines operate using both incoming and outgoing tides,

and they can pump water either into or out of the reservoir. These

features allow daily and seasonal changes in power generation to be

“smoothed out.” These turbines also deliver electricity most economically.

Many engineering problems had to be solved, however,

before the dam could be built in the tidal estuary.

The La Rance plant produces 240 megawatts of electricity. Its

twenty-four highly reliable turbine generator sets operate about 95

percent of the time. Output is coordinated with twenty-four other

hydroelectric plants by means of a computer program. In this system,

pump-storage stations use excess La Rance power during periods

of low demand to pump water into elevated reservoirs. Later,

during peak demand, this water is fed through a power plant, thus

“saving” the excess generated at La Rance when it was not immediately

needed. In this way, tidal energy, which must be used or lost as

the tides continue to flow, can be saved.



Consequences



The operation of La Rance proved the practicality of tide-generated

electricity. The equipment, engineering practices, and operating

procedures invented for La Rance have been widely applied. Submersible,

low-head, high-flow reversible generators of the La Rance

type are now used in Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Russia, Canada,

the United States, and elsewhere.

Economic problems have prevented the building of more large

tidal power plants. With technological advances, the inexorable

depletion of oil and coal resources, and the increasing cost of nu-

clear power, tidal power may be used more widely in the future.

Construction costs may be significantly lowered by using preconstructed

power units and dam segments that are floated into place

and submerged, thus making unnecessary expensive dams and reducing

pumping costs.







See also : Compressed-air-accumulating power plant; Geothermal power; Nuclear power plant; Nuclear reactor; Solar thermal engineThermal cracking process.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Robot (industrial)





The people behind the invention:



Karel Capek (1890-1938), a Czech playwright

George C. Devol, Jr. (1912- ), an American inventor

Joseph F. Engelberger (1925- ), an American entrepreneur





Robots, from Concept to Reality



The 1920 play Rossum’s Universal Robots, by Czech writer Karel

Capek, introduced robots to the world. Capek’s humanoid robots—

robot, a word created by Capek, essentially means slave—revolted

and took over the world, which made the concept of robots somewhat

frightening. The development of robots, which are now defined

as machines that do work that would ordinarily be carried out

by humans, has not yet advanced to the stage of being able to produce

humanoid robots, however, much less robots capable of carrying

out a revolt.

Most modern robots are found in industry, where they perform

dangerous or monotonous tasks that previously were done by humans.

The first industrial robots were the Unimates (short for “universal

automaton”), which were derived from a robot design invented

by George C. Devol and patented in 1954. The first Unimate

prototypes, developed by Devol and Joseph F. Engelberger, were

completed in 1962 by Unimation Incorporated and tested in industry.

They were so successful that the company, located in Danbury,

Connecticut, manufactured and sold thousands of Unimates to

companies in the United States and abroad. Unimates are very versatile

at performing routine industrial tasks and are easy to program

and reprogram. The tasks they perform include various steps in automobile

manufacturing, spray painting, and running lathes. The

huge success of the Unimates led companies in other countries to

produce their own industrial robots, and advancing technology has

improved all industrial robots tremendously.



 A New Industrial Revolution



Each of the first Unimate robots, which were priced at $25,000,

was almost five feet tall and stood on a four-foot by five-foot base. It

has often been said that a Unimate resembles the gun turret of a

minitank, set atop a rectangular box. In operation, such a robot will

swivel, swing, and/or dip and turn at the wrist of its hydraulically

powered arm, which has a steel hand. The precisely articulated

hand can pick up an egg without breaking it. At the same time, however,

it is powerful enough to lift a hundred-pound weight.

The Unimate is a robotic jack of all trades: It can be programmed,

in about an hour, to carry out a complex operation, after which it can

have its memory erased and be reprogrammed in another hour to

do something entirely different. In addition, programming a Unimate

requires no special training. The programmer simply uses a teachcable

selector that allows the programmer to move the Unimate arm

through the desired operation. This selector consists of a group of

pushbutton control boxes, each of which is equipped with buttons

in opposed pairs. Each button pair records the motion that will put a

Unimate arm through one of five possible motions, in opposite directions.

For example, pushing the correct buttons will record a motion

in which the robot’s arm moves out to one side, aims upward,

and angles appropriately to carry out the first portion of its intended

job. If the Unimate overshoots, undershoots, or otherwise

performs the function incorrectly, the activity can be fine-tuned

with the buttons.

Once the desired action has been performed correctly, pressing a

“record” button on the robot’s main control panel enters the operation

into its computer memory. In this fashion, Unimates can be programmed

to carry out complex actions that require as many as two

hundred commands. Each command tells the Unimate to move its

arm or hand in a given way by combining the following five motions:

sliding the arm forward, swinging the arm horizontally, tilting

the arm up or down, bending the wrist up or down, and swiveling

the hand in a half-circle clockwise or counterclockwise.

Before pressing the “record” button on the Unimate’s control

panel, the operator can also command the hand to grasp an item

when in a particular position. Furthermore, the strength of the

grasp can be controlled, as can the duration of time between each action.

Finally, the Unimate can be instructed to start or stop another

routine (such as operating a paint sprayer) at any point. Once the instructor

is satisfied with the robot’s performance, pressing a “repeat

continuous” control starts the Unimate working. The robot will stop

repeating its program only when it is turned off.

Inside the base of an original Unimate is a magnetic drum that

contains its memory. The drum turns intermittently, moving each of

two hundred long strips of metal beneath recording heads. This

strip movement brings specific portions of each strip—dictated by

particular motions—into position below the heads. When the “record”

button is pressed after a motion is completed, the hand position

is recorded as a series of numbers that tells the computer the

complete hand position in each of the five permissible movement

modes.

Once “repeat continuous” is pressed, the computer begins the

command series by turning the drum appropriately, carrying out

each memorized command in the chosen sequence. When the sequence

ends, the computer begins again, and the process repeats

until the robot is turned off. If a Unimate user wishes to change the

function of such a robot, its drum can be erased and reprogrammed.

Users can also remove programmed drums, store them for future

use, and replace them with new drums.



Consequences



The first Unimates had a huge impact on industrial manufacturing.

In time, different sizes of robots became available so that additional

tasks could be performed, and the robots’ circuitry was improved.

Because they have no eyes and cannot make judgments,

Unimates are limited to relatively simple tasks that are coordinated

by means of timed operations and simple computer interactions.

Most of the thousands of modern Unimates and their multinational

cousins in industry are very similar to the original Unimates

in terms of general capabilities, although they can now assemble

watches and perform other delicate tasks that the original Unimates

could not perform. The crude magnetic drums and computer controls

have given way to silicon chips and microcomputers, which

have made the robots more accurate and reliable. Some robots can

even build other robots, and others can perform tasks such as mowing

lawns and walking dogs.

Various improvements have been planned that will ultimately

lead to some very interesting and advanced modifications. It is

likely that highly sophisticated humanoid robots like those predicted

by Karel Capek will be produced at some future time. One

can only hope that these robots will not rebel against their human

creators.





See also here !


Thursday, May 21, 2009

Compressed-air-accumulating power plant





The invention:



Plants that can be used to store energy in the form

of compressed air when electric power demand is low and use it

to produce energy when power demand is high.



The organization behind the invention:



Nordwestdeutsche Kraftwerke, a Germany company









Power, Energy Storage, and Compressed Air



Energy, which can be defined as the capacity to do work, is essential

to all aspects of modern life. One familiar kind of energy, which

is produced in huge amounts by power companies, is electrical energy,

or electricity. Most electricity is produced in a process that consists

of two steps. First, a fossil fuel such as coal is burned and the resulting

heat is used to make steam. Then, the steam is used to

operate a turbine system that produces electricity. Electricity has

myriad applications, including the operation of heaters, home appliances

of many kinds, industrial machinery, computers, and artificial

illumination systems.

An essential feature of electricity manufacture is the production

of the particular amount of electricity that is needed at a given time.

If moment-to-moment energy requirements are not met, the city or

locality involved will experience a “blackout,” the most obvious

feature of which is the loss of electrical lighting. To prevent blackouts,

it is essential to store extra electricity at times when power production

exceeds power demands. Then, when power demands exceed

the capacity to make energy by normal means, stored energy

can be used to make up the difference.

One successful modern procedure for such storage is the compressed-

air-accumulation process, pioneered by the Nordwestdeutsche

Kraftwerke company’s compressed-air-accumulating power

plant, which opened in December, 1978. The plant, which is

located in Huntorf, Germany (at the time, West Germany), makes

compressed air during periods of low electricity demand, stores the

air in an underground cavern, and uses it to produce extra electricity

during periods of high demand.



Plant Operation and Components



The German 300-megawatt compressed-air-accumulating power

plant in Huntorf produces extra electricity from stored compressed

air that will provide up to four hours per day of local peak electricity

needs. The energy-storage process, which is vital to meeting very

high peak electric power demands, is viable for electric power

plants whose total usual electric outputs range from 25 megawatts

to the 300 megawatts produced at Huntorf. It has been suggested,

however, that the process is most suitable for 25- to 50-megawatt

plants.

The energy-storage procedure used at Huntorf is quite simple.

All the surplus electricity that is made in nonpeak-demand periods

is utilized to drive an air compressor. The compressor pumps air

from the surrounding atmosphere into an airtight underground

storage cavern. When extra electricity is required, the stored compressed

air is released and passed through a heating unit to be

warmed, after which it is used to run gas-turbine systems that produce

electricity. This sequence of events is the same as that used in

any gas-turbine generating system; the only difference is that the

compressed air can be stored for any desired period of time rather

than having to be used immediately.

One requirement of any compressed-air-accumulating power

plant is an underground storage chamber. The Huntorf plant utilizes

a cavern that was hollowed out some 450 meters below the surface

of the earth. The cavern was created by drilling a hole into an

underground salt deposit and pumping in water. The water dissolved

the salt, and the resultant saltwater solution (brine) was

pumped out of the deposit. The process of pumping in water and removing

brine was continued until the cavern reached the desired

size. This type of storage cavern is virtually leak-free. The preparation

of such underwater salt-dome caverns has been performed

roughly since the middle of the twentieth century. Until the Huntorf

endeavor, such caves were used to stockpile petroleum and natural

gas for later use. It is also possible to use mined, hard-rock caverns

for compressed-air accumulation when it is necessary to compress

air to pressures higher than those that can be maintained effectively

in a salt-dome cavern.

The essential machinery that must be added to conventional

power plants to turn them into compressed-air-accumulating power

plants are motor-driven air compressors and gas turbine generating

systems. This equipment must be connected appropriately so that

in the storage mode, the overall system will compress air for storage

in the underground cavern, and in the power-production mode, the

system will produce electricity from the stored compressed air.

Large compressed-air-accumulating power plants require specially

constructed machinery. For example, the compressors that

are used at Huntorf were developed specifically for that plant by

Sulzer, a Swiss company. When the capacity of such plants is no

higher than 50 megawatts, however, standard, readily available

components can be used. This means that relatively small compressed-

air-accumulating power plants can be constructed for a reasonable

cost.





Consequences



The development of compressed-air-accumulating power plants

has had a significant impact on the electric power industry, adding to

its capacity to store energy. The main storage methods available prior

to the development of compressed-air-accumulation methodology

were batteries and water that was pumped uphill (hydro-storage). Battery

technology is expensive, and its capacity is insufficient for major,

long-term power storage. Hydro-storage is a more viable technology.

Compressed-air energy-storage systems have several advantages

over hydro-storage. First, they can be used in areas where flat terrain

makes it impossible to use hydro-storage. Second, compressedair

storage is more efficient than hydro-storage. Finally, the fact that

standard plant components can be used, along with several other

factors, means that 25- to 50-megawatt compressed-air storage plants

can be constructed much more quickly and cheaply than comparable

hydro-storage plants.

The attractiveness of compressed-air-accumulating power plants

has motivated efforts to develop hard-rock cavern construction

techniques that cut costs and make it possible to use high-pressure

air storage. In addition, aquifers (underground strata of porous rock

that normally hold groundwater) have been used successfully for

compressed-air storage. It is expected that compressed-air-accumulating

power plants will be widely used in the future, which will

help to decrease pollution and cut the use of fossil fuels.





See also : Alkaline storage battery; Breeder reactor; Fuel cell; Geothermal

power; Heat pump; Nuclear power plant; Tidal power plant.