Showing posts with label Consequences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consequences. Show all posts
Saturday, June 7, 2014
Tidal power plant
The invention:
Plant that converts the natural ocean tidal forces
into electrical power.
The people behind the invention:
Mariano di Jacopo detto Taccola (Mariano of Siena, 1381-1453),
an Italian notary, artist, and engineer
Bernard Forest de Bélidor (1697 or 1698-1761), a French engineer
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945), president of the United States
Tidal Energy
Ocean tides have long been harnessed to perform useful work.
Ancient Greeks, Romans, and medieval Europeans all left records
and ruins of tidal mills, and Mariano di Jacopo included tidal power
in his treatise De Ingeneis (1433; on engines). Some mills consisted of
water wheels suspended in tidal currents, others lifted weights that
powered machinery as they fell, and still others trapped the high
tide to run a mill.
Bernard Forest de Bélidor’s Architecture hydraulique (1737; hydraulic
architecture) is often cited as initiating the modern era of
tidal power exploitation. Bélidor was an instructor in the French
École d’Artillerie et du Génie (School of Artillery and Engineering).
Industrial expansion between 1700 and 1800 led to the construction
of many tidal mills. In these mills, waterwheels or simple turbines
rotated shafts that drove machinery by means of gears or
belts. They powered small enterprises located on the seashore.
Steam engines, however, soon began to replace tidal mills. Steam
could be generated wherever it was needed, and steam mills were
not dependent upon the tides or limited in their production capacity
by the amount of tidal flow. Thus, tidal mills gradually were abandoned,
although a few still operate in New England, Great Britain,
France, and elsewhere.
Electric Power from Tides
Modern society requires tremendous amounts of electric energy
generated by large power stations. This need was first met by
using coal and by damming rivers. Later, oil and nuclear power became
important. Although small mechanical tidal mills are inadequate
for modern needs, tidal power itself remains an attractive
source of energy. Periodic alarms about coal or oil supplies and
concern about the negative effects on the environment of using
coal, oil, or nuclear energy continue to stimulate efforts to develop
renewable energy sources with fewer negative effects. Every crisis—
for example, the perceived European coal shortages in the
early 1900’s, oil shortages in the 1920’s and 1970’s, and growing
anxiety about nuclear power—revives interest in tidal power.
In 1912, a tidal power plant was proposed at Busum, Germany.
The English, in 1918 and more recently, promoted elaborate schemes
for the Severn Estuary. In 1928, the French planned a plant at Aber-
Wrach in Brittany. In 1935, under the leadership of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt, the United States began construction of a tidal power
plant at Passamaquoddy, Maine. These plants, however, were never
built. All of them had to be located at sites where tides were extremely
high, and such sites are often far from power users. So
much electricity was lost in transmission that profitable quantities
of power could not be sent where they were needed. Also, large
tidal power stations were too expensive to compete with existing
steam plants and river dams. In addition, turbines and generators
capable of using the large volumes of slow-moving tidal water that
reversed flow had not been invented. Finally, large tidal plants inevitably
hampered navigation, fisheries, recreation, and other uses
of the sea and shore.
French engineers, especially Robert Gibrat, the father of the La
Rance project, have made the most progress in solving the problems
of tidal power plants. France, a highly industrialized country, is
short of coal and petroleum, which has brought about an intense
search by the French for alternative energy supplies.
La Rance, which was completed in December, 1967, is the first
full-scale tidal electric power plant in the world. The Chinese, however,
have built more than a hundred small tidal electric stations about the size of the old mechanical tidal mills, and the Canadians
and the Russians have both operated plants of pilot-plant size.
La Rance, which was selected from more than twenty competing
localities in France, is one of a few places in the world where the
tides are extremely high. It also has a large reservoir that is located
above a narrow constriction in the estuary. Finally, interference with
navigation, fisheries, and recreational activities is minimal at La
Rance.
Submersible “bulbs” containing generators and mounting propeller
turbines were specially designed for the La Rance project.
These turbines operate using both incoming and outgoing tides,
and they can pump water either into or out of the reservoir. These
features allow daily and seasonal changes in power generation to be
“smoothed out.” These turbines also deliver electricity most economically.
Many engineering problems had to be solved, however,
before the dam could be built in the tidal estuary.
The La Rance plant produces 240 megawatts of electricity. Its
twenty-four highly reliable turbine generator sets operate about 95
percent of the time. Output is coordinated with twenty-four other
hydroelectric plants by means of a computer program. In this system,
pump-storage stations use excess La Rance power during periods
of low demand to pump water into elevated reservoirs. Later,
during peak demand, this water is fed through a power plant, thus
“saving” the excess generated at La Rance when it was not immediately
needed. In this way, tidal energy, which must be used or lost as
the tides continue to flow, can be saved.
Consequences
The operation of La Rance proved the practicality of tide-generated
electricity. The equipment, engineering practices, and operating
procedures invented for La Rance have been widely applied. Submersible,
low-head, high-flow reversible generators of the La Rance
type are now used in Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Russia, Canada,
the United States, and elsewhere.
Economic problems have prevented the building of more large
tidal power plants. With technological advances, the inexorable
depletion of oil and coal resources, and the increasing cost of nu-
clear power, tidal power may be used more widely in the future.
Construction costs may be significantly lowered by using preconstructed
power units and dam segments that are floated into place
and submerged, thus making unnecessary expensive dams and reducing
pumping costs.
See also : Compressed-air-accumulating power plant; Geothermal power; Nuclear power plant; Nuclear reactor; Solar thermal engine; Thermal cracking process.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Robot (industrial)
The people behind the invention:
Karel Capek (1890-1938), a Czech playwright
George C. Devol, Jr. (1912- ), an American inventor
Joseph F. Engelberger (1925- ), an American entrepreneur
Robots, from Concept to Reality
The 1920 play Rossum’s Universal Robots, by Czech writer Karel
Capek, introduced robots to the world. Capek’s humanoid robots—
robot, a word created by Capek, essentially means slave—revolted
and took over the world, which made the concept of robots somewhat
frightening. The development of robots, which are now defined
as machines that do work that would ordinarily be carried out
by humans, has not yet advanced to the stage of being able to produce
humanoid robots, however, much less robots capable of carrying
out a revolt.
Most modern robots are found in industry, where they perform
dangerous or monotonous tasks that previously were done by humans.
The first industrial robots were the Unimates (short for “universal
automaton”), which were derived from a robot design invented
by George C. Devol and patented in 1954. The first Unimate
prototypes, developed by Devol and Joseph F. Engelberger, were
completed in 1962 by Unimation Incorporated and tested in industry.
They were so successful that the company, located in Danbury,
Connecticut, manufactured and sold thousands of Unimates to
companies in the United States and abroad. Unimates are very versatile
at performing routine industrial tasks and are easy to program
and reprogram. The tasks they perform include various steps in automobile
manufacturing, spray painting, and running lathes. The
huge success of the Unimates led companies in other countries to
produce their own industrial robots, and advancing technology has
improved all industrial robots tremendously.
A New Industrial Revolution
Each of the first Unimate robots, which were priced at $25,000,
was almost five feet tall and stood on a four-foot by five-foot base. It
has often been said that a Unimate resembles the gun turret of a
minitank, set atop a rectangular box. In operation, such a robot will
swivel, swing, and/or dip and turn at the wrist of its hydraulically
powered arm, which has a steel hand. The precisely articulated
hand can pick up an egg without breaking it. At the same time, however,
it is powerful enough to lift a hundred-pound weight.
The Unimate is a robotic jack of all trades: It can be programmed,
in about an hour, to carry out a complex operation, after which it can
have its memory erased and be reprogrammed in another hour to
do something entirely different. In addition, programming a Unimate
requires no special training. The programmer simply uses a teachcable
selector that allows the programmer to move the Unimate arm
through the desired operation. This selector consists of a group of
pushbutton control boxes, each of which is equipped with buttons
in opposed pairs. Each button pair records the motion that will put a
Unimate arm through one of five possible motions, in opposite directions.
For example, pushing the correct buttons will record a motion
in which the robot’s arm moves out to one side, aims upward,
and angles appropriately to carry out the first portion of its intended
job. If the Unimate overshoots, undershoots, or otherwise
performs the function incorrectly, the activity can be fine-tuned
with the buttons.
Once the desired action has been performed correctly, pressing a
“record” button on the robot’s main control panel enters the operation
into its computer memory. In this fashion, Unimates can be programmed
to carry out complex actions that require as many as two
hundred commands. Each command tells the Unimate to move its
arm or hand in a given way by combining the following five motions:
sliding the arm forward, swinging the arm horizontally, tilting
the arm up or down, bending the wrist up or down, and swiveling
the hand in a half-circle clockwise or counterclockwise.
Before pressing the “record” button on the Unimate’s control
panel, the operator can also command the hand to grasp an item
when in a particular position. Furthermore, the strength of the
grasp can be controlled, as can the duration of time between each action.
Finally, the Unimate can be instructed to start or stop another
routine (such as operating a paint sprayer) at any point. Once the instructor
is satisfied with the robot’s performance, pressing a “repeat
continuous” control starts the Unimate working. The robot will stop
repeating its program only when it is turned off.
Inside the base of an original Unimate is a magnetic drum that
contains its memory. The drum turns intermittently, moving each of
two hundred long strips of metal beneath recording heads. This
strip movement brings specific portions of each strip—dictated by
particular motions—into position below the heads. When the “record”
button is pressed after a motion is completed, the hand position
is recorded as a series of numbers that tells the computer the
complete hand position in each of the five permissible movement
modes.
Once “repeat continuous” is pressed, the computer begins the
command series by turning the drum appropriately, carrying out
each memorized command in the chosen sequence. When the sequence
ends, the computer begins again, and the process repeats
until the robot is turned off. If a Unimate user wishes to change the
function of such a robot, its drum can be erased and reprogrammed.
Users can also remove programmed drums, store them for future
use, and replace them with new drums.
Consequences
The first Unimates had a huge impact on industrial manufacturing.
In time, different sizes of robots became available so that additional
tasks could be performed, and the robots’ circuitry was improved.
Because they have no eyes and cannot make judgments,
Unimates are limited to relatively simple tasks that are coordinated
by means of timed operations and simple computer interactions.
Most of the thousands of modern Unimates and their multinational
cousins in industry are very similar to the original Unimates
in terms of general capabilities, although they can now assemble
watches and perform other delicate tasks that the original Unimates
could not perform. The crude magnetic drums and computer controls
have given way to silicon chips and microcomputers, which
have made the robots more accurate and reliable. Some robots can
even build other robots, and others can perform tasks such as mowing
lawns and walking dogs.
Various improvements have been planned that will ultimately
lead to some very interesting and advanced modifications. It is
likely that highly sophisticated humanoid robots like those predicted
by Karel Capek will be produced at some future time. One
can only hope that these robots will not rebel against their human
creators.
See also here !
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Compressed-air-accumulating power plant

The invention:
Plants that can be used to store energy in the form
of compressed air when electric power demand is low and use it
to produce energy when power demand is high.
The organization behind the invention:
Nordwestdeutsche Kraftwerke, a Germany company
Power, Energy Storage, and Compressed Air
Energy, which can be defined as the capacity to do work, is essential
to all aspects of modern life. One familiar kind of energy, which
is produced in huge amounts by power companies, is electrical energy,
or electricity. Most electricity is produced in a process that consists
of two steps. First, a fossil fuel such as coal is burned and the resulting
heat is used to make steam. Then, the steam is used to
operate a turbine system that produces electricity. Electricity has
myriad applications, including the operation of heaters, home appliances
of many kinds, industrial machinery, computers, and artificial
illumination systems.
An essential feature of electricity manufacture is the production
of the particular amount of electricity that is needed at a given time.
If moment-to-moment energy requirements are not met, the city or
locality involved will experience a “blackout,” the most obvious
feature of which is the loss of electrical lighting. To prevent blackouts,
it is essential to store extra electricity at times when power production
exceeds power demands. Then, when power demands exceed
the capacity to make energy by normal means, stored energy
can be used to make up the difference.
One successful modern procedure for such storage is the compressed-
air-accumulation process, pioneered by the Nordwestdeutsche
Kraftwerke company’s compressed-air-accumulating power
plant, which opened in December, 1978. The plant, which is
located in Huntorf, Germany (at the time, West Germany), makes
compressed air during periods of low electricity demand, stores the
air in an underground cavern, and uses it to produce extra electricity
during periods of high demand.
Plant Operation and Components
The German 300-megawatt compressed-air-accumulating power
plant in Huntorf produces extra electricity from stored compressed
air that will provide up to four hours per day of local peak electricity
needs. The energy-storage process, which is vital to meeting very
high peak electric power demands, is viable for electric power
plants whose total usual electric outputs range from 25 megawatts
to the 300 megawatts produced at Huntorf. It has been suggested,
however, that the process is most suitable for 25- to 50-megawatt
plants.
The energy-storage procedure used at Huntorf is quite simple.
All the surplus electricity that is made in nonpeak-demand periods
is utilized to drive an air compressor. The compressor pumps air
from the surrounding atmosphere into an airtight underground
storage cavern. When extra electricity is required, the stored compressed
air is released and passed through a heating unit to be
warmed, after which it is used to run gas-turbine systems that produce
electricity. This sequence of events is the same as that used in
any gas-turbine generating system; the only difference is that the
compressed air can be stored for any desired period of time rather
than having to be used immediately.
One requirement of any compressed-air-accumulating power
plant is an underground storage chamber. The Huntorf plant utilizes
a cavern that was hollowed out some 450 meters below the surface
of the earth. The cavern was created by drilling a hole into an
underground salt deposit and pumping in water. The water dissolved
the salt, and the resultant saltwater solution (brine) was
pumped out of the deposit. The process of pumping in water and removing
brine was continued until the cavern reached the desired
size. This type of storage cavern is virtually leak-free. The preparation
of such underwater salt-dome caverns has been performed
roughly since the middle of the twentieth century. Until the Huntorf
endeavor, such caves were used to stockpile petroleum and natural
gas for later use. It is also possible to use mined, hard-rock caverns
for compressed-air accumulation when it is necessary to compress
air to pressures higher than those that can be maintained effectively
in a salt-dome cavern.
The essential machinery that must be added to conventional
power plants to turn them into compressed-air-accumulating power
plants are motor-driven air compressors and gas turbine generating
systems. This equipment must be connected appropriately so that
in the storage mode, the overall system will compress air for storage
in the underground cavern, and in the power-production mode, the
system will produce electricity from the stored compressed air.
Large compressed-air-accumulating power plants require specially
constructed machinery. For example, the compressors that
are used at Huntorf were developed specifically for that plant by
Sulzer, a Swiss company. When the capacity of such plants is no
higher than 50 megawatts, however, standard, readily available
components can be used. This means that relatively small compressed-
air-accumulating power plants can be constructed for a reasonable
cost.
Consequences
The development of compressed-air-accumulating power plants
has had a significant impact on the electric power industry, adding to
its capacity to store energy. The main storage methods available prior
to the development of compressed-air-accumulation methodology
were batteries and water that was pumped uphill (hydro-storage). Battery
technology is expensive, and its capacity is insufficient for major,
long-term power storage. Hydro-storage is a more viable technology.
Compressed-air energy-storage systems have several advantages
over hydro-storage. First, they can be used in areas where flat terrain
makes it impossible to use hydro-storage. Second, compressedair
storage is more efficient than hydro-storage. Finally, the fact that
standard plant components can be used, along with several other
factors, means that 25- to 50-megawatt compressed-air storage plants
can be constructed much more quickly and cheaply than comparable
hydro-storage plants.
The attractiveness of compressed-air-accumulating power plants
has motivated efforts to develop hard-rock cavern construction
techniques that cut costs and make it possible to use high-pressure
air storage. In addition, aquifers (underground strata of porous rock
that normally hold groundwater) have been used successfully for
compressed-air storage. It is expected that compressed-air-accumulating
power plants will be widely used in the future, which will
help to decrease pollution and cut the use of fossil fuels.
See also : Alkaline storage battery; Breeder reactor; Fuel cell; Geothermal
power; Heat pump; Nuclear power plant; Tidal power plant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

